热门站点| 世界资料网 | 专利资料网 | 世界资料网论坛
收藏本站| 设为首页| 首页

Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration

作者:法律资料网 时间:2024-06-28 01:52:22  浏览:8450   来源:法律资料网
下载地址: 点击此处下载

Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration

Commissioner of SFDA


Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration



(SFDA Decree No. 21)

The Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and Drug Administration, adopted at the executive meeting of the State Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) on November 18, 2005, is hereby promulgated and shall go into effect as of the date of promulgation.


Shao Mingli
Commissioner of SFDA
November 18, 2005





Special Review and Approval Procedure for Drug Registration of the State Food and
Drug Administration


Chapter 1 General Provisions

Article 1 This Procedure is formulated for the purpose of effective prevention, timely control and elimination of the hazards of public health emergencies to ensure the health and safety of the public in accordance with the Drug Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Prevention and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Regulations for Implementation of the Drug Administration Law of the People’s Republic of China, Regulations on Preparedness for and Response to Emergent Public Health Hazards, and other relevant laws and regulations.

Article 2 The special review and approval procedure for drug registration refers to the procedure and requirements of the State Food and Drug Administration to carry out special review and approval of drugs for handling public heath emergencies under the principle of unified leadership, early involvement, expeditiousness and efficiency, and scientific review and approval, in an effort to approve drugs for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies as soon as possible under the threat or after the occurrence of public heath emergencies.

Article 3 The State Food and Drug Administration may, according to law, decide to follow the Procedure to conduct special review and approval of drugs for public health emergencies in any of the following circumstances:
(1) Where the President of the People’s Republic of China declares a state of emergency or the State Council decides that certain areas within a province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government are in a state of emergency;
(2) Where the contingency program for public health emergencies is initiated according to law;
(3) Where the drug reserve department or the health administrative department of the State Council proposes a special review and approval for drugs having existing national drug standard;
(4) Other circumstances applicable to special review and approval.

Article 4 The State Food and Drug Administration is responsible for the review and approval of clinical trials, production and importation of drugs for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies.

The (food and) drug regulatory department of a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall, upon entrustment of the State Food and Drug Administration, be responsible for on-site inspection and sampling of the pilot products of the drugs for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies.


Chapter 2 Application Acceptance and On-site Inspection

Article 5 Where the special review and approval procedure for drug registration is initiated, the State Food and Drug Administration is responsible for the acceptance of registration applications for drugs for public health emergencies.

Where a drug or a preventive biological product for public health emergencies has not been marketed in China, the applicant shall, before submission of the registration application, provide the State Food and Drug Administration with relevant research and development information.

Article 6 The applicant shall submit a registration application with relevant technical dossier to the State Food and Drug Administration according to the relevant provisions and requirements on administration of drug registration.

The registration application for drug for public health emergencies may be submitted in electronic form.

Article 7 Before submitting an application for registration, the applicant may provide a feasibility assessment application with general information and relevant explanations. The State Food and Drug Administration shall only comment on the scientific rationality and feasibility of the drug project, and respond within 24 hours.

The response to a feasibility assessment application shall be neither deemed as the review and approval opinion nor legally binding on the review and approval result of a registration application.

Article 8 The State Food and Drug Administration shall organize an expert group to evaluate and review the registration application for drug for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies, make a decision within 24 hours on whether or not to accept the application, and notify the applicant.

Article 9 Where a registration application is accepted, the State Food and Drug Administration shall organize technical review of submitted dossier within 24 hours and at the same time notify the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region or municipality directly under the Central Government where the applicant is located to conduct an on-site inspection on drug research and development conditions, and organize sampling and testing of pilot products.

The (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall, within five days, submit the on-site inspection result and relevant opinion to the State Food and Drug Administration.

Article 10 The (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall organize staff from the departments of drug registration, drug safety and inspection, etc. to participate in the on-site inspection.

The National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products shall be notified to send staff to participate in the on-site inspection and sampling of preventive biological products.

Article 11 For drugs that have existing national standards for the prevention and treatment of public health emergencies, the State Food and Drug Administration may directly review and approve the drug in accordance with the relevant provisions in Chapter 6 of the Procedure when it deems there is no need for a clinical trial in accordance with law.

Article 12 With respect to the registration application for a specific vaccine, where only the original virus strain used in the manufacturing is changed while the manufacturing processes or quality specifications are maintained, the State Food and Drug Administration shall make a decision on whether or not to grant the approval within three days after verifying the changed strain used in the manufacturing.


Chapter 3 Testing for Registration

Article 13 After receiving the samples taken by the (food and) drug regulatory department of a province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government, the drug testing institution shall immediately organize verification of specifications and laboratory testing on the samples.

The drug testing institution shall complete the testing within the time frame for the drug being applied.

Article 14 For a drug applied first time for marketing, the State Food and Drug Administration may, when necessary, make early involvement by appointing the National Institute for the Control of Pharmaceutical and Biological Products to communicate with the applicant prior to testing for registration so as to timely resolve technical problems which may arise in the process of quality specifications verification and laboratory testing.

With respect to preventive biological products used to prevent and control the epidemic of serious infectious diseases, the State Food and Drug Administration may, depending on the situation, allow the testing for registration and the manufacturer’s self-testing to be performed in parallel.

Article 15 After completion of the specifications verification and laboratory testing on a drug, the drug testing institution shall, within two days, issue its verification opinion and submit it along with the drug test report to the State Food and Drug Administration.


Chapter 4 Technical Review

Article 16 The State Food and Drug Administration shall, within 15 days after acceptance of the registration application for drug for the prevention and treatment in public health emergencies, complete the first round of technical review.

Article 17 Where the State Food and Drug Administration considers that additional data are needed, it shall immediately inform the applicant of the content and timeline.

Where the applicant submits the supplementary data within the specified timeline, the State Food and Drug Administration shall complete the technical review within three days, or, depending on the situations, organize another review meeting within five days, and then complete the review report within two days.


Chapter 5 Clinical Trial

Article 18 Where the technical review is completed, the State Food and Drug Administration shall, within three days, complete the administrative examination, make a decision and inform the applicant.

Where the State Food and Drug Administration decides to approve a clinical trial, it shall issue a Drug Clinical Trial Approval. Where it decides not to approve, it shall issue a Disapproval Notice with reasons.

Article 19 Where an applicant obtains a clinical trial approval, it shall conduct the trial strictly following the relevant requirements in the approval document, and comply with the Good Clinical Practice.

Article 20 Drug clinical trials shall be conducted in institutions legally certified for drug clinical trials. If a clinical trial has to be conducted by an institution not yet certified, a special approval by the State Food and Drug Administration should be obtained.

The application for a clinical trial conducted by an institution not yet certified for drug clinical trials may be submitted along with the application for drug registration.

Article 21 The investigator responsible for a drug clinical trial shall, in accordance with the relevant provisions, timely report adverse events occurred in the process of the clinical trial to the State Food and Drug Administration. If no adverse event occurs, the investigator shall collect relevant information and report to the State Food and Drug Administration monthly.

Article 22 The State Food and Drug Administration shall, in accordance with law, supervise and inspect the clinical trials of drugs for public health emergencies.


Chapter 6 Review, Approval and Monitoring of Drug Production

Article 23 The applicant shall, after completion of the drug clinical trials, submit the relevant data to the State Food and Drug Administration in accordance with the Provisions for Drug Registration.

Article 24 The State Food and Drug Administration shall, within 24 hours after receiving data submitted by the applicant, organize technical review, and at the same time notify the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government where the applicant is located to conduct the on-site inspection on the drug manufacturing conditions, and organize the sampling and testing of pilot products.

The (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government shall, within five days, submit the result and opinion of the on-site inspection to the State Food and Drug Administration.

Article 25 Any newly-established drug manufacturer or manufacturer with newly-built manufacturing workshops or newly-added dosage forms for production may apply to the State Food and Drug Administration for a certificate of the Good Manufacturing Practice along with the application for drug registration. The State Food and Drug Administration shall, when conducting the drug registration review, immediately carry out an inspection on the Good Manufacturing Practice certification.

Article 26 The drug testing institution shall, after receiving the samples of three batches taken by the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government, immediately arrange the testing.

Upon completion of testing, the drug testing institution shall, within two days, complete the test report and submit it to the State Food and Drug Administration.

Article 27 The State Food and Drug Administration shall carry out technical review in accordance with Chapter 4 of the Procedure, and shall, within three days after the completion of the technical review, complete the administrative examination, make a decision and inform the applicant.
Where the State Food and Drug Administration decides to approve the drug, it shall issue the Letter of Approval for Drug Registration, and may grant an approval number for the drug at the same time if the applicant has appropriate manufacturing conditions; if it decides to disapprove the manufacturing, it shall issue a Disapproval Notice with reasons.

Article 28 Where a drug manufacturer or distributor, or a medical and health institution finds any new or serious adverse drug reaction or cluster adverse reaction relating to a specially approved drug for public health emergencies, it shall immediately report the case to the local (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government, the health administrative department at the provincial level and the professional institution for adverse drug reactions monitoring.

The professional institution for adverse drug reactions monitoring shall regard drugs specially approved for public health emergencies as critically monitored products, analyze the collected case reports in accordance with the relevant provisions and timely report to the (food and) drug regulatory department of the province, autonomous region, or municipality directly under the Central Government and the State Food and Drug Administration.

The State Food and Drug Administration shall reinforce the reevaluation of approved drugs for public health emergencies after they are marketed.


Chapter 7 Supplementary Provisions

Article 29 The measures for special review and approval of the medical devices for public health emergencies shall be separately formulated by the State Food and Drug Administration with reference to the relevant provisions of the Procedure.

Article 30 The Procedure shall go into effect as of the date of promulgation.





下载地址: 点击此处下载
小额官司

2000年9月28日 13:45
──几类思考的理路*

  ……一讼之兴,未见曲直,而吏有纸张之费,役有饭食之需,证佐之亲友必须酬劳,往往所费多于所争,且守候公门,费时失业,一经官断,须有输赢,从此乡党变为讼仇,薄产化为乌有切齿数世,悔之晚矣(吴炽昌:《续客窗闲话·卷三》)。

  听讼,吾犹人也。必也使无讼乎(孔子语,见《论语·颜渊》)!

  一日,"奉诏"进京,在一大媒体上清谈"小额官司该不该打",引起不小争议。事后,与业内友人交谈,又再深入论及,将几类思考展示铺开爬梳整理,小有斩获。现动笔写一下。

1、语境·小额官司的脉络

先交代语境。

  国人久远的习惯,大概是和众息讼,不到万不得已,不进官府衙门法律了断。据说,这是今日法治观念依然疲软的一个缘由。有了纠纷,先想到和解,或者忍着,或者看看风景以便将其抛在脑后,是一种心态。这种心态有时会使日子过得不那么紧张。可是,一种心态就会影响做事的方式,还有发散的效应,传入社区乃至大社会,使人随之而动。这样,与"法"连接的"立法"、"执法"、"司法"、"守法"之类的语汇,便易在集体记忆中失却。失却的结果,使得人人做事无棱无角,规矩方圆游离不定,而企图不良者,倒有机可乘了。

  国人传统是这样被叙述的。

  法律是种硬规矩。大致来说,清楚、可查,断是非一准是个好凭据。古人讲,它可定分止争。今人说,它可明权利、标义务。一句话,法律打紧的功能在于创造纹路清晰的秩序制度。是是非非,必须断个小葱拌豆腐。如果是你的,一分不能少,如果是他的,半厘不能差。由此,法治意识凸现的意义不言自明──公民权利彰显了。至少,企图不良者,寸步难行。或者,奔大了讲,法治可是眼下赶上现代化末班车的一个好帮手。

  于是,打官司,而不是私了、忍着或者看风景忘掉一切,便形成了一种激励性质的意识形态话语涌动。

  语境明晰之后,看看小额官司。

 时下,小额官司已是见怪不怪。十来二十元钱的纠纷可进法院,一元钱的"别扭"也会进公堂,就是三角五角的芝麻丁点"不舒服",也能讨个"法律说法"。法院从不拒绝,当然,似乎不会也不大应该拒绝。

 此次进京清谈的小额官司,是一元钱的事儿。一名可敬的当事者,喜欢法律,便在书店里买了一本《走向法庭》的书。说来有趣,这书与法有关,本应印得"毫不含糊",质量上乘,可它硬是打中间少了几十页。买书者走后才发现瑕疵,于是便杀回书店理论,要求换书。书店二话不说,同意换书。但是,买书者说,来时乘车花去五角,回去乘车还要五角,两钱相加,需要一元。这一元还应由书店支付。书店一听,犯愁,便以种种理由说明一元钱无法"奉还"。买书者再次理论,书店死撑。结果,在一元钱上是没有结果。

  没过多久,买书者真是"走向法庭",将书店推在被告席上。意思是:一元钱必须交出来。

  官司的标的额数真小。

  依着一般感觉,这钱不必较真儿。打官司本身就要钱,而且,费时费力,搅在火头上,还会伤了感情,得不偿失。可买书者相信,一元钱是自己的权益,权益就应保护、就应争取,那是他心中的"澳门"。换词儿来说,站在高处看,公民权利要张扬。这样,大约以两千元左右的成本,买书者讨回了一元钱的"公道"。法院说,一元钱,书店毫无疑问要掏出来。

2、官司的成本计算

  通常来说,一些法律学者和经济学者,甚至一些外行百姓,就像刚提到的,首先会想到"官司成本"这一茬儿。这就是,别忘了官司要钱,费时费力。打官司,不该入不敷出。如果为买斤菜,却花上几十倍的钱打的士奔远处去买,这是经济算数没学好,更是精神有些不正常。所以,用一元钱的成本来打两千元的官司,才划算。

  当然,学者们的想法也许更为宏大。他们,不但会站在百姓的立场,拨拉当事人的小算盘,而且,会站在国家立场,拨拉社会的大算盘。大算盘意思是说,社会资源就那么多,一处用了,另处便少。像法院审案断狱,人力、物力、时间,都是一个数,用在一纠纷上,其他纠纷就会搁置一旁。况且,国人法院目下已是忙得不可开交,小额官司挤进去,法院还要拿出精力、时间,为此支出不小的社会成本,审别的大案要案,资源便更拮据了。这样引来的经济学"外部性",非常糟糕。

  制度经济学还说,要警惕交易过程中的成本。交易成本过大,会使交易本身失去意义。而交易成本放在法律自身,便是法律制度的运行成本。法律制度的设立,是为了价值对等的秩序安排。俩小儿斗嘴,法律制度要过问,这使价值就不对等了。两人动刀子,或者,一百万元说不清是谁的,这时法律制度过问,价值自然对等了,而且有收益。故而,运行成本加大,效益却是判明一元钱的胜负,制度也就不是节约资源的制度了。

  "成本计算说"是对小额官司运作的批评。但是,它会遇到两个反批评。

  先讲头一个。

  前边已经交代,当下的语境是国人大体缺乏权利意识,有些逆来顺受的习性,这使一些人好钻空子。在一元钱的案子里,书店里的人就有点钻空子的意思,因为,不太拿消费者当回事。此时,有人站出来,宣战一番,即便官司额数小的不能再小,其意义也是唤醒了万民的"维权"意识,从而,叫书店里的一类人收敛点。这效果,能用钱计算?

  第二,纠纷本身的收益和损失,有时可不是钱能算清的。如果这一元钱不仅是个心中的"澳门",而且,不收回来怒气难消,无法继续过活,那么,怎能说打官司的意义不大?对人来说,有时钱不重要,重要的是一股"气"。"气"顶在那儿,不出来,就是怎样都不成。社会还会因此乱套,产生更为激烈的冲突。对这,还另有事实拐弯辅证。在世界上大部分国家里,几乎所有法院都不拒绝小额官司,即使额数微不足道。兴许,法院记得这一茬儿,记得数额再小,如不过问,有时也会产生更大的头痛冲突。

对外贸易经济合作部关于整顿和规范对新加坡劳务合作市场秩序的紧急通知

对外贸易经济合作部


对外贸易经济合作部关于整顿和规范对新加坡劳务合作市场秩序的紧急通知
对外贸易经济合作部
外经贸合发(2001)268号




各省、自治区、直辖市及计划单列市外经贸委(厅、局),有关中央管理企业:
我对新加坡劳务合作业务近10年来发展迅速,新已成为我外派劳务的最大市场。由于市场竞争激烈,建筑业劳务市场倒卖进入指标的情况也愈演愈烈,并存在高额收费的违规现象。个别不法商人专门靠倒卖进入指标赚钱,有的甚至到我国招收为新政府禁止的所谓自由工。所以,我赴新建筑劳务的利益经常受到侵害,大规模的劳务纠纷时有发生,对内对外均造成了不良影响,已严重损害了我对外劳务合作的形象。
为规范我赴新劳务市场秩序,保护我劳务人员的合法权益,经商外交部,现就有关问题紧急通知如下:
一、严格禁止非法劳务。经营公司在签订对外合同时必须认真核实新方雇主的用工项目,劳务人员必须取得新政府有关部门核发的工作准证后才能派出,禁止任何单位或个人以任何名义招收赴新建筑劳务自由工。各级外经贸主管部门要认真审查,严格把关。
二、对新方雇主或中介商要进行确认,禁止经营公司与新非法中介商合作或签约。从2001年6月1日起,任何中国公司在与新方公司签约前需请我驻新使馆经商处对该新加坡公司的资信予以确认,严禁向未经驻新使馆经商处确认的新方公司派遣劳务人员。经过确认的新方公司如有违规操作行为,我方公司发现后须及时向驻新使馆经商处反映,以便经商处掌握情况、采取措施。
三、严格收费标准。经营公司收取劳务人员费用(服务费、履约保证金及应由劳务人员个人负担的出国费用)必须严格按照财政部和外经贸部联合下发的《对外经济合作企业外派人员工资管理办法的补充规定》(财外字〔1997〕8号文件)执行,不得超过规定标准或巧立名目增加收费。经营公司必须把劳务人员按规定交纳的履约保证金全额存在国内,不得以任何名义或形式交给新方,禁止向劳务人员收取非法费用(如所谓指标费、应由新方雇主向新政府交纳的抵押金等)。经营公司如有前述非法收费,劳务人员可以抵制,并可随时要求公司无条件全额退还,外经贸部也将在查清事实的基础上依据有关规定对有关公司做出严肃处理。
四、以上规定请各有关单位认真执行。外经贸部将组织对经营公司派新劳务情况和地方主管部门审批情况进行抽查,对于有违规操作行为的将根据国家有关规定进行处罚。
特此通知


2001年2月22日

版权声明:所有资料均为作者提供或网友推荐收集整理而来,仅供爱好者学习和研究使用,版权归原作者所有。
如本站内容有侵犯您的合法权益,请和我们取得联系,我们将立即改正或删除。
京ICP备14017250号-1